Quality of life survey in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome before and after operation / 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the influence of OSAHS in quality of life (QOL) for children and its changes before and after surgery.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Pediatric OSAHS disease-specific quality of life survey (OSA-18) and polysomnography (PSG) were used to analysis in 54 cases within 4 weeks before surgery. They were treated by tonsillectomy in 8 cases and adenoid tonsillectomy in 32 cases, adenoidectomy alone in 14 cases and were followed up in 12 to 18 months post-operation.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The impact of pediatric OSAHS on QOL was severe in 61.11% patients. There were significant statistically correlation between OSA-18 and AHI, LSaO2 before surgery. After surgery, the total scores of QOL were improved in 75.92% cases in general. The domains of sleep disturbance in 88.89% cases, caregiver concerns in 74.07% and physical suffering in 70.37% were significantly improved, respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Pediatric OSAHS had severely influenced in quality of life of children. There are significant correlations between the survey in quality of life of pediatric OSAHS (OSA-18) and the objective data in PSG. OSA-18 can be a valuable measure in clinical diagnosis and treatment follow-up.</p>

Primary evaluation of the indications of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty / 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the indications of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and clinical staging for oropharyngeal narrow in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).</p><p><b>METHOD</b>Sixty-six OSAHS patients were retrospectively analyzed, the data of physical examination and clinical staging for oropharyngeal narrow were built based on body mass index (BMI), palate-tongue position, tonsil sizes and hypertrophy degree in lateral side of oropharynx. The patients who had palatine-tongue position in degree 1 to 2 (no significant tongue enlargement) were defined as stage I (32 cases). The patients who had palatine-tongue position in degree 3 to 4 (tongue enlargement) were defined as stage II (34 cases). Among them, the patients with tonsil sizes 0 to 1 were stage I a (5 cases) and stage IIa (10 cases), another group with tonsil size 2 to 4 were stage I b (27 cases) and stage II b (24 cases), respectively. The indications of UPPP were evaluated according to the results of polysomnography (PSG) before and after operation.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>PSG in 1 to 2 years after operation showed: the surgical efficiency of UPPP had not any difference (P > 0.05) among different groups with the severity of OSAHS(labeled in preoperational AHI and LSaO2). Surgical results was better in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.023). Success of operation was defined as postoperational AHI <20/h and reduced more than 50% compared to preoperational AHI and symptoms alleviated significantly. Successful rates of UPPP in stage I b (70.4%, 19/27 cases) were statistically higher than that of other groups (I a:0%; I b:70. 4%; II a:20.0%; II b: 16.7%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Clinical staging system for oropharyngeal narrow is based on palate-tongue position and tonsil size. It is helpful to choose the surgical indications of UPPP for patients with OSAHS. It is the best UPPP indication for stage I b patients who had no tongue enlargement (palatine-tongue position 1 to 2) and accompanied with enlargement of tonsil size (in degree 2 to 4) and their sleep breathing disorder could be alleviated through UPPP.</p>